Matthew Wilkinson Professional Negligence Solicitors MiddlesbroughMatthew Wilkinson Professional Negligence Solicitors MiddlesbroughMatthew Wilkinson Professional Negligence Solicitors MiddlesbroughMatthew Wilkinson Professional Negligence Solicitors Middlesbrough
Specialists in Negligence Claims against Lawyers
  • Home
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • About Us
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • CLAIM TYPES
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • Solicitor Negligence
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • Reviews
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • Free Enquiry
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • Contact
        • HOME

          ABOUT US

          Expertise
          Why Choose Us

          CLAIM TYPES

          Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim
          Failing To Obtain Evidence
          Land or Property advice
          Limitation dates and Time Limits
          Matrimonial Assets Advice
          Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
          Procedural Errors
          Time Barred Claims
          Undervalued/under settled claims
        • SOLICITOR NEGLIGENCE

          Barrister Negligence
          Clinical (Medical) Negligence
          Commercial
          Conveyancing/Property
          Criminal
          Disputes & Litigation
          Employment
          Estates and Trusts
          Family
          Immigration
          Lawyers negligence
          Negligence of other Lawyers
          No Win No Fee
          Personal Injury
          Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
        • REVIEWS

          Case Studies
          Testimonials

          FREE ENQUIRY

          CONTACT

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Claim Types
    • Failing to issue or serve a valid Claim Professional Negligence Claims
    • Failing To Obtain Evidence
    • Land or Property advice
    • Limitation dates and Time Limits
    • Matrimonial Assets Advice
    • Part 36 or Protective Offers Advice
    • Procedural Errors
    • Time Barred Claims
    • Undervalued/under settled Claims
  • Solicitor Negligence
    • Barrister Professional Negligence Claims
    • Clinical (Medical) Negligence
    • Conveyancing/Property
    • Commercial
    • Criminal
    • Disputes & Litigation
    • Employment
    • Estates and Trusts
    • Family
    • Immigration
    • Lawyers negligence
    • Negligence of other Lawyers
    • Personal Injury
    • No Win No Fee
    • Advice Centres and other Legal Advisers
  • Reviews
  • Free Enquiry
  • Contact Us
  • CALL US
  • EMAIL US
  • FREE ENQUIRY

If Davies v Liberty Place was an ingenious Mitchell buster has it been torpedoed by Denton v White?

July 10, 2014

In Paul Dean Davies V Liberty Place (Sheepcote Street) Management Co (2014) Leggatt J found an apparently ingenious way to get round the obvious draconian effects of Mitchell (Andrew Mitchell MP V News Group Newspapers Limited 2013) by a simple but apparently logical maneuvre in finding that the Mitchell test did not apply if the sanction was conditional and had not yet been imposed. The Mitchell decision has been widely condemned as very harsh in imposing a robust enforcement of Rules and Orders and a strict interpretation of Rule 3.9, which prior to the recent Jackson Reforms to Civil Procedure had been used in a wide range of circumstances to obtain relief from a sanction imposed by the Court or the Rules. The message after Mitchell was do not breach Rules or Court Orders and do not expect to be excused if you are in breach unless the breach is trivial or you have a very good reason. However, simple errors or not planning workloads so that deadlines could be met was not a good excuse, even if the other side was not prejudiced and the sanction was unfair or disproportionate. The importance of the efficient and proportionate conduct of litigation and compliance with Rules and Orders could trump the unfairness to the defaulting party, even if their case was struck out or, as in Mitchell, he was denied the right to recover an estimated £500,000 in costs from the other side, if he won the case. The interests of the administration of justice generally were to be allowed to outweigh the interests of justice in the individual case. Davies was a case where the specific circumstances were familiar as Leggatt J was dealing with the late service of witness statements and the application of Rule 32.10 which states “If a witness statement is not served in respect of an intended witness within the time specified by the Court, then the witness may not be called to give oral evidence unless the Court gives permission.” This was the very rule in operation in the Denton appeal due for consideration by the Court of Appeal in the combined ‘Mitchell’ appeals. Leggatt J found in Davies that the Judge below was right to say that in applying Mitchell there would be no relief from sanction but went on to say that the Judge below had been wrong to find that Mitchell applied because it was not an application for relief from sanctions after all. On a true construction of the Rule 32.10 no relief was required until the sanction had taken effect, which would only be when a witness was unable to be called as a result of Rule 32.10. Accordingly a defaulting party did not have to apply for relief from sanctions but could simply apply for an extension of time prior to the time for the witness to be called, because the Rule itself offered a route for avoiding the sanction.

There is clearly a logical justification for this decision, as why else would the rule provide a route for escaping the sanction, if in every case an application for relief can be made, so this specific route must be something different, a consideration on different principles to Mitchell, perhaps akin to a normal application for an extension of time made in time?

However, although Mitchell clearly does not apply to applications for extensions of time made prior to default, the default in Davies had already occurred, even though it was before the sanction had impacted on the case or the defaulting party. When the reasoning in Davies is considered in more detail it sounds very much like a pre-Mitchell judgement with an appreciation of the 2-strike rule of thumb with applications for unless and debarring orders preferred to robust enforcement of the rules. Further, not all sanctions imposed by the Court have an immediate effect, such as the costs sanction in Mitchell itself, which would only have real effect in respect of costs recovery after judgement. In any event in Mitchell, like in Davies, the sanction in Rule 3.14 used by analogy, had the get out clause, unless the Court otherwise Orders. If Davies was right, by the same logic, the Mitchell decision would be different if the sanction had been imposed directly by Rule 3.14, rather than by analogy because it was the pilot scheme rules, which did not have a specific sanction. Despite the attraction of the result in Davies and its initial apparent logic, this decision may have been condemned to a short lifespan as it surely would not withstand close scrutiny of the higher judiciary unless Mitchell and the ethos of the Jackson reforms was to be diluted beyond recognition. Well, we know that this is not gong to happen and the Court of Appeal in the Denton, Decadent and Utilise combined appeals has confirmed Mitchell and provided further guidance on its interpretation. It is clear that there is no going back and Davies is surely sunk by the Denton appeal itself. This was an appeal against an Order granting relief from the sanction imposed by Rule 32.10 for the late service of witness statements and the Court of Appeal granted the appeal and therefore re-imposed the sanction in 32.10 because relief was refused under Rule 3.9. It could not really have done that if Rule 32.10 did not impose a sanction to which Rule 3.9 applied!! The Davies theory of Leggatt J was not however referred to in the judgement of the Court of Appeal, which could therefore lead to a somewhat brave attempt to apply the same argument in the future…..

What Next ?

With most legal matters It is better to take action sooner rather than later. We know that contacting a Solicitor can create anxiety itself, which is why you can contact us without obligation.

Call us on 0800 043 9981 or dial 0333 577 0172 if calling from a mobile.

Complete a Free Online Enquiry or contact us via email on enquiry@matthewwilkinson.co.uk we’ll have a no obligation chat with you about what you need and what you hope to achieve. We’ll happily answer any questions or queries you have and give you advice on how to progress your matter.

You can be sure if you contact us that whatever you ask us to do for you will be handled professionally and efficiently, so you can get the best outcome possible without any of the hassle.

Free, No Obligation Enquiry

  • This information will only be used to deal with your enquiry. For more information on how we handle your data, please click the link to our Privacy Policy.

Testimonials

“We were at our lowest point when we discovered this firm – just in time! Integrity and honesty are in abundance here. Down to earth, practical and the best advice in the world. The service was exc… Read more
Mr. and Mrs. WTyne and Wear
“As someone who has had no cause to use the services of a solicitor before, I found the service you provided relaxed, friendly and thorough. Every step of the process was explained to me and I felt … Read more
Mr. FStockton-on-Tees
“Mathew Wilkinson is a trustworthy person who has provided excellent service and isn’t just in it for the money. He genuinely considers the clients best interest and gives the right advice. I woul… Read more
Mr. RMiddlesbrough
“Thank You Mr Large and Mr Wilkinson and all staff for all the help and support.”  
Mr CGateshead
“The service I received from the first phone call was excellent. The stress and worry of my claim was taken away by the understanding manner of my adviser.”
Mrs HMiddlesbrough
“Excellent all round service. Highly recommended.”
Mr MShenfield
“A massive thank you for all your support in dealing with my issues. It is greatly appreciated. I wish you all every success in the future.”
Mrs RBradford
“I recently won a claim for personal injury due to the professional way in which Matthew Wilkinson dealt with my case. I have nothing more than the highest of praise for them. I contacted them about… Read more
Mrs RBirmingham
“More than capable, thorough and well researched, dedicated towards achieving the desired result – from start to finish. A light of hope in a dire situation.”
Mr KSheffield
“Excellent all round service. Highly recommended.”
Mr M Shenfield
“Matthew Wilkinson assisted me in a professional negligence claim against another firm of solicitors, who had previously represented me with a medical negligence claim. Their practice had left me wi… Read more
Mrs. BHartlepool
“We would like to thank Matthew Wilkinson and Co for the exceptional way they handled our case, keeping us well informed and advised at every point, and eventually provided us with a very good outco… Read more
Mr & Mrs AFerryhill, Co Durham
“Matthew Wilkinson gave a superb service in bringing a very complicated negligence case to a conclusion. I was able to speak with him promptly on every occasion. Personally I would not hesitate in r… Read more
Mr FCambridgeshire
“I was very satisfied with your service! Thank you very much for what you have done for me, I would recommend you to anyone without a doubt!”
Mr MSouthampton
“More than capable, thorough and well researched, dedicated towards achieving the desired result – from start to finish. A light of hope in a dire situation.”
Mr KSheffield
“Thank You Mr Large and Mr Wilkinson and all staff for all the help and support.”
Mr CGateshead
Mr Wilkinson was dedicated to getting a positive outcome from day one. I dealt with almost a dozen Solicitors, Advisors and Experts over the years ONLY Matthew Wilkinson knew what he was doing. Thanks… Read more
Mr VMerseyside
“The advice I received was good and effective and presented in a friendly helpful manner.”
Mr H.Yarm
“Many thanks for your professional efficient service. I was particularly impressed with the way my case was dealt with in a personal compassionate manner and was always kept informed of progress of … Read more
Mr. CEastbourne
“Absolutely Professional Service.”
Mr. TRedcar
“Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors are a very honest hardworking firm of Solicitors. I would recommend them for any case. Very professional attention to detail.”
Mr. PLondon
“All of my communications have been by telephone. An excellent service provided. Everything explained fully so as to be easily understood. Many thanks for your superb service. You gave me an und… Read more
Mrs NDurham
“Everything was professionaly completed with careful attention to detail. At all stages MW made us feel comfortable and confident.”  
Mr and Mrs SNewcastle
You believed in our case when other solicitors didn’t. You worked thoroughly through complex financial situations and got us a result we were very happy with.
Mr HBradford on Avon
“I would just like to say Matthew Wilkinson took on my case after it had been with another Solicitor for 2 years with no progress, and in a short period of time with their experience and professiona… Read more
Mrs MBlackpool
“Very good. You took a risk as it was such short notice and we never met it was a long distance relationship but a successful one. Thank you again Mr Zand letters to the Defendant were amazing!!” … Read more
Mrs CSwansea
“I can definitely recommend Matthew Wilkinson, Solicitor, who did work on my behalf a couple of years ago. It was a fairly complex and extremely concerning matter, with respect to the negligence of … Read more
Mr WLeeds
“Thank You Mr Large and Mr Wilkinson and all staff for all the help and support.”
Mr CGateshead
“I hired Matthew to deal with a very complex solicitors negligence case which took approximately three years to complete. He was extremely knowledgeable, showing excellent resolve in difficult circu… Read more
Mr. GNewcastle-upon-Tyne
Great Service, with no hassle. Exceeded my expectations.
Mr PIreland
“Thank you very much for all that you did for me.”
Mrs SStockton-on-Tees
I found dealing with Matthew Wilkinson first class. They always kept me fully informed as to progress with our claim and gave excellent advice as to settling the claim with the other party.
P LtdWest Midlands
“I was very pleased that Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors agreed to act on my behalf and during the two year time span of my case they acted professionally and personably throughout.”    … Read more
Mr RWrexham
“Excellent and very efficient service. When ever I contacted the Solicitor I was greated in a friendly professional maner. I was always updated throughout the case. Excellent!”
Mr W & Ms S Dorset
“My experience of using Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors was a very pleasant one from start to finish. In one word it was SUPERB.”
Mr S Mid Wales
I have found that Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors have been extremely helpful. I have been kept in the loop the whole time and obviously with the best outcome. Many thanks.
Ms BSwansea
“After a really bad experience with solicitors, I reached out to Matthew Wilkinson. He was kind and courteous. He kept me informed and advised me all the way through, he truly was my advocate throug… Read more
Mrs. AFlorida USA
“Thank you, we very much appreciated you taking the time to give us some very crucial advice.”
Mr SLondon
“Everything was professionaly completed with careful attention to detail. At all stages MW made us feel comfortable and confident.”
Mr and Mrs SNewcastle
Matthew Wilkinson offered a professional service. Louise White was helpful, efficient and explained this clearly.
Mrs MNorfolk
“Very professional in all areas from start to the end of the process.”  
A Ltd, Cheshire
“I recommend Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors to anyone who has a claim against another Solicitor. In dealing with obdurate Professional Indemnity Insurers they are very skilled, experienced and tenacio… Read more
Mr HSomerset
“I found dealing with Matthew Wilkinson first class. They always kept me fully informed as to progress with our claim and gave excellent advice as to settling the claim with the other party.”   … Read more
P Ltd West Midlands
“The advice I received was good and effective and presented in a friendly helpful manner.”
Mr HYarm
I was very pleased that Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors agreed to act on my behalf and during the two year time span of my case they acted professionally and personably throughout.
Ms MWrexham
“Just a few words to say how grateful I am to yourself and the team. Due to your professionalism and hard work you won my case for me against two other solicitors who had let me down badly due to t… Read more
Mrs HMiddlesbrough
Professionally persistent and can be judged by results and deliverables of the client.
Mr. SAustralia
“We were well represented by Mr Large in a very astute manner and friendly. Thank You.”
Mr & Mrs CMiddlesbrough
“The purpose of this letter is to express my gratitude and thanks for the way in which you have helped me in every aspect, from the start and to the end of the case from setting up payment and the g… Read more
Mr SRedcar
“Prompt, courteous and efficient, overall good value.”
Mr and Mrs HMiddlesbrough
“In negligence suits one can feel desperate and without hope, but with Matthew’s help and expertise I successfully managed to procure a settlement against the negligent party. I am therefore confi… Read more
Mrs. S Bournemouth
After my previous Solicitor let me down badly, I approached yourselves and was told by Matthew Large to see if I could get another Solicitor regarding my injury claim after approaching seven Solicitor… Read more
Mr CStockton
“Very professional in all areas from start to the end of the process.”
A LtdCheshire
“During the last six years I have entrusted solicitors in Manchester, The Legal Complaints Department and the Ombudsman to try and resolve a Legal Negligence Claim against another Manchester Solicit… Read more
Mr RManchester
“Very Good”
Mr BHartlepool
“Thank God for the internet, where I found Matthew Wilkinson. A very professional company and a pleasure to work with. My case was won and I would not hesitate to recommend Matthew Wilkinson to anyo… Read more
Mr BBarnsley
We found the firm, especially Jenny Bainbridge, to be extremely helpful and pleasant. Thank you.
Mr EWrexham

Our Expertise

RECENT POSTS

  • Ground Rent Escalation Clauses & Ground Rent Doubling Every 25 Years
    Ground Rent escalation clauses in residential
  • The Court Fee Hike: A Walk along a Dangerous Path-the Road to Abuse of Process and Strike Out
    1. The Obvious Problem Increased Court fees create a
Matthew Wilkinson Professional Negligence Solicitors Middlesbrough

CONTACT INFORMATION

  • 0800 043 9981 or 0333 577 0172
  •  enquiry@matthewwilkinson.co.uk

SEARCH

Copyright 2024 Matthew Wilkinson.
  • Accessibility
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Regulatory Information
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Complaints Procedure
    Matthew Wilkinson BA MPNLA

    • Degree BA Hons (Law) 1980

    • William Hutton Law Prize 1981

    • Admitted as a Solicitor October 1983

    • Member of the Law Society and the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association.

    • Trained with family firm (Father and Grandfather were Solicitors)

    • Solicitor and then Partner in family firm 1983-1991

    • Set up Matthew Wilkinson Solicitors 1991

    • Deputy Coroner District of North East North Yorkshire 1988-1996

    • Acting Coroner North East North Yorkshire 1996- 2000 (District closed)

    Extensive experience in a broad range of contentious and non-contentious legal work for individuals and businesses. First became interested in claims against Solicitors in 1986 and has over 25 years experience in Professional Negligence claims against Solicitors and other lawyers. Having specialised in this area of work, he has built up a niche practice, which he finds interesting and challenging, at the same time as giving him the opportunity to help people with difficult problems, which arise when they have been let down by a previous Solicitor or other lawyer.

    Interests

    • The Law and helping people.

    • Football and cricket supporter

    Matthew says “I enjoy using the law in challenging situations to help people achieve a just result regardless of the apparent strength or resources of the opposition.”

    Jahan Zand LLB

    • From Middlesbrough

    • Degree LLB Hons (Law and Politics)   2007

    • Member of the Law Society

    • Joined Matthew Wilkinson June 2009

    • Trained with Matthew Wilkinson 2009-2012

    • Admitted as a Solicitor March 2012

    • Experience gained in training with property, probate, family, general litigation and Professional Negligence. Since admission is now mainly handling Professional Negligence cases

    Interests

    • Japanese language and animation